The "Small Potatoes" Paradox: Why Do They Bother?
- maldonpem
- Apr 9
- 3 min read
Updated: Apr 10

I often find myself looking at the sheer scale of this 10-year campaign, and asking a simple question: Why me?
The people involved in this—the primary individual, the family members, and the collaborators—hold all the cards. They have connections galore, financial resources, and social influence. I, by comparison, am "small potatoes." I don't have a Rolodex of power or a team of people at my beck and call.
So why launch an aggressive defamation campaign? Why coordinate apartment break-ins? Why put so much energy into destroying my business, reputation and life?
Personally, I don’t get it. None of the stories being circulated are true, yet the collaborators buy into them as absolute facts. While these people believe they are acting on the truth, they're actually being fed carefully constructed fiction.
It begs the question: if this group has all the resources and all the 'power,' why do they feel the need to manipulate their own circle with such elaborate lies just to persist in this obsession?"
The Need for a Common Enemy
Groups with power often maintain their internal loyalty by having an "out-group" to target. By demonizing me, they create a shared mission. It binds them together. In their narrative, I am the villain, which allows them to play the heroes or the "victims" in a story they have entirely manufactured.
The Thrill of Total Dominance
For people obsessed with control, there is no greater satisfaction than trying to dismantle someone who doesn't have the same "cards" to play. If they went after someone of equal stature, there would be a fair fight and real consequences. By targeting me, they feel they can exercise total dominance with zero accountability.
When they break into my apartment or sift through my trash, it isn’t because they need anything I have. It’s a display of "because we can."
Protection Through Projection
Often, these aggressive campaigns are a preemptive strike. If they are engaging in unethical or "psychotic" behavior, the best way to hide it is to accuse the target of that very same behavior.
By telling the world that I am the one who is "obsessed" or "stalking," they create a smoke screen. They use their collective resources to get their lies out first, hoping that the sheer volume of voices in their group will drown out the truth of my experience.
A Performance of Victimhood
They thrive on being the "sympathetic figures." But for that story to work, they need a monster. Since I am not actually doing anything to them, they have to manufacture the "crimes." They use their connections to spread stories about Pickleball "hunts" or hallway stalking because it buys them the attention and communal bond they crave.
The Tell-Tale Persistence
The fact that they persist is the ultimate "tell." If I were truly the "obsessed" one, people with "connections galore" would have moved on with their successful lives long ago. Instead, they stay. They break in. They coordinate. They obsess.
Their persistence doesn't prove my guilt—it proves their collective fixation. You don't use a sledgehammer to kill a fly unless you are obsessed with the fly.
I hold no cards, but I hold the truth. And after 10 years, it’s clear that the truth is the one thing they are terrified of.
The Simplicity of the Truth: I Have Done Nothing
In the middle of these shifting scripts and high-level orchestrations, there is one simple fact that they cannot change: I have done absolutely nothing to anyone.
I don’t follow them. I don’t stalk their halls. I don’t target their families or their businesses. I don’t engage in the very behaviors they have spent a decade accusing me of. The reality is that I am just a person trying to live my life—to work, to exercise, and to exist in peace.
The only 'action' I have taken in the last 10 years is the exhausting, daily effort to fend off their unprovoked attacks. You cannot point to a single instance where I have harmed them, because it simply hasn't happened. My only 'offense' is my refusal to be broken by their narrative."
The Final Discernment: A Call to the Truth
Despite everything I have written, despite the documented evidence, and despite the glaring inconsistencies in their stories, I know I cannot force anyone to believe me.
I often tell people of faith, or those who believe in the wisdom of the universe, to take a step back from the noise. If you have been recruited into this narrative, I invite you to do one thing: Ask.
Ask for the truth to be revealed. Ask for the clarity to recognize the difference between a person seeking peace and a group seeking destruction.
I can’t convince you, but the truth can. It takes a person of true faith—and a character—to take that step, to listen, and to heed what is revealed.
The truth doesn't need "connections galore" or a decade of stories to survive. It only needs to be found.



Comments